| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293 |
- .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
- ============================================================
- DOs and DON'Ts for designing and writing Devicetree bindings
- ============================================================
- This is a list of common review feedback items focused on binding design. With
- every rule, there are exceptions and bindings have many gray areas.
- For guidelines related to patches, see
- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
- Overall design
- ==============
- - DO attempt to make bindings complete even if a driver doesn't support some
- features. For example, if a device has an interrupt, then include the
- 'interrupts' property even if the driver is only polled mode.
- - DON'T refer to Linux or "device driver" in bindings. Bindings should be
- based on what the hardware has, not what an OS and driver currently support.
- - DO use node names matching the class of the device. Many standard names are
- defined in the DT Spec. If there isn't one, consider adding it.
- - DO check that the example matches the documentation especially after making
- review changes.
- - DON'T create nodes just for the sake of instantiating drivers. Multi-function
- devices only need child nodes when the child nodes have their own DT
- resources. A single node can be multiple providers (e.g. clocks and resets).
- - DON'T use 'syscon' alone without a specific compatible string. A 'syscon'
- hardware block should have a compatible string unique enough to infer the
- register layout of the entire block (at a minimum).
- Properties
- ==========
- - DO make 'compatible' properties specific. DON'T use wildcards in compatible
- strings. DO use fallback compatibles when devices are the same as or a subset
- of prior implementations. DO add new compatibles in case there are new
- features or bugs.
- - DO use a vendor prefix on device-specific property names. Consider if
- properties could be common among devices of the same class. Check other
- existing bindings for similar devices.
- - DON'T redefine common properties. Just reference the definition and define
- constraints specific to the device.
- - DO use common property unit suffixes for properties with scientific units.
- Recommended suffixes are listed at
- https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml
- - DO define properties in terms of constraints. How many entries? What are
- possible values? What is the order?
- Typical cases and caveats
- =========================
- - Phandle entries, like clocks/dmas/interrupts/resets, should always be
- explicitly ordered. Include the {clock,dma,interrupt,reset}-names if there is
- more than one phandle. When used, both of these fields need the same
- constraints (e.g. list of items).
- - For names used in {clock,dma,interrupt,reset}-names, do not add any suffix,
- e.g.: "tx" instead of "txirq" (for interrupt).
- - Properties without schema types (e.g. without standard suffix or not defined
- by schema) need the type, even if this is an enum.
- - If schema includes other schema (e.g. /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml) use
- "unevaluatedProperties:false". In other cases, usually use
- "additionalProperties:false".
- - For sub-blocks/components of bigger device (e.g. SoC blocks) use rather
- device-based compatible (e.g. SoC-based compatible), instead of custom
- versioning of that component.
- For example use "vendor,soc1234-i2c" instead of "vendor,i2c-v2".
- - "syscon" is not a generic property. Use vendor and type, e.g.
- "vendor,power-manager-syscon".
- Board/SoC .dts Files
- ====================
- - DO put all MMIO devices under a bus node and not at the top-level.
- - DO use non-empty 'ranges' to limit the size of child buses/devices. 64-bit
- platforms don't need all devices to have 64-bit address and size.
|