locks.rst 2.4 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465
  1. .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
  2. ==========================
  3. File Locking Release Notes
  4. ==========================
  5. Andy Walker <andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no>
  6. 12 May 1997
  7. 1. What's New?
  8. ==============
  9. 1.1 Broken Flock Emulation
  10. --------------------------
  11. The old flock(2) emulation in the kernel was swapped for proper BSD
  12. compatible flock(2) support in the 1.3.x series of kernels. With the
  13. release of the 2.1.x kernel series, support for the old emulation has
  14. been totally removed, so that we don't need to carry this baggage
  15. forever.
  16. This should not cause problems for anybody, since everybody using a
  17. 2.1.x kernel should have updated their C library to a suitable version
  18. anyway (see the file "Documentation/process/changes.rst".)
  19. 1.2 Allow Mixed Locks Again
  20. ---------------------------
  21. 1.2.1 Typical Problems - Sendmail
  22. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  23. Because sendmail was unable to use the old flock() emulation, many sendmail
  24. installations use fcntl() instead of flock(). This is true of Slackware 3.0
  25. for example. This gave rise to some other subtle problems if sendmail was
  26. configured to rebuild the alias file. Sendmail tried to lock the aliases.dir
  27. file with fcntl() at the same time as the GDBM routines tried to lock this
  28. file with flock(). With pre 1.3.96 kernels this could result in deadlocks that,
  29. over time, or under a very heavy mail load, would eventually cause the kernel
  30. to lock solid with deadlocked processes.
  31. 1.2.2 The Solution
  32. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  33. The solution I have chosen, after much experimentation and discussion,
  34. is to make flock() and fcntl() locks oblivious to each other. Both can
  35. exists, and neither will have any effect on the other.
  36. I wanted the two lock styles to be cooperative, but there were so many
  37. race and deadlock conditions that the current solution was the only
  38. practical one. It puts us in the same position as, for example, SunOS
  39. 4.1.x and several other commercial Unices. The only OS's that support
  40. cooperative flock()/fcntl() are those that emulate flock() using
  41. fcntl(), with all the problems that implies.
  42. 1.3 Mandatory Locking As A Mount Option
  43. ---------------------------------------
  44. Mandatory locking was prior to this release a general configuration option
  45. that was valid for all mounted filesystems. This had a number of inherent
  46. dangers, not the least of which was the ability to freeze an NFS server by
  47. asking it to read a file for which a mandatory lock existed.
  48. Such option was dropped in Kernel v5.14.