| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132 |
- .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
- System configuration
- ====================
- There are a number of different aspects to configuring U-Boot to build and then
- run on a given platform or set of platforms. Broadly speaking, some aspects of
- the world can be configured at run time and others must be done at build time.
- In general run time configuration is preferred over build time configuration.
- But when making these decisions, we also need to consider if we're talking about
- a feature that could be useful to virtually every platform or something specific
- to a single hardware platform. The resulting image size is also another
- important consideration. Finally, run time configuration has additional overhead
- both in terms of resource requirements and wall clock time. All of this means
- that care must be taken when writing new code to select the most appropriate
- configuration mechanism.
- When adding new features to U-Boot, be they a new subsystem or SoC support or
- new platform for an existing supported SoC, the preferred configuration order
- is:
- #. Hardware based run time configuration. Examples of this include reading
- processor specific registers, or a set of board specific GPIOs or an EEPROM
- with a known format to it. These are the cases where we either cannot or
- should not be relying on device tree checks. We use this for cases such as
- optimized boot time or starting with a generic device tree and then enabling
- or disabling features as we boot.
- #. Making use of our Kconfig infrastructure and C preprocessor macros that have
- the prefix ``CONFIG``. This is the primary method of build time
- configuration. This is generally the best fit for when we want to enable or
- disable some sort of feature, such as the SoC or network support. The
- ``CONFIG`` prefix for C preprocessor macros is strictly reserved for Kconfig
- usage only.
- #. Making use of the :doc:`device tree <devicetree/control>` to determine at
- run time how to configure a feature that we have enabled via Kconfig. For
- example, we would use Kconfig to enable an I2C chip driver, but use the device
- tree to know where the I2C chip resides in memory and other details we need
- in order to configure the bus.
- #. Making use of C header files directly and defining C preprocessor macros that
- have the ``CFG`` prefix. While the ``CFG`` prefix is reserved for this build
- time configuration mechanism, the usage is ad hoc. This is to be used when the
- previously mentioned mechanisms are not possible, or for legacy code that has
- not been converted.
- Dynamic run time configuration methods.
- ---------------------------------------
- Details of hardware specific run time configuration methods are found within the
- documentation for a given processor family or board.
- Details of how to use run time configuration based on :doc:`driver model
- <driver-model/index>` are covered in that documentation section.
- Static build time configuration methods
- ---------------------------------------
- There are two mechanisms used to control the build time configuration of U-Boot.
- One is utilizing Kconfig and ``CONFIG`` prefixed macros and the other is ad hoc
- usage of ``CFG`` prefixed macros. Both of these are used when it is either not
- possible or not practical to make a run time determination about some
- functionality of the hardware or a required software feature or similar. Each of
- these has their own places where they are better suited than the other for use.
- The `Kconfig language
- <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/kconfig-language.html>`_ is well
- documented and used in a number of projects, including the Linux kernel. We
- implement this with the Kconfig files found throughout our sources. This
- mechanism is the preferred way of exposing new configuration options as there
- are a number of ways for both users and system integrators to manage and change
- these options. Some common examples here are to enable a specific command within
- U-Boot or even a whole subsystem such as NAND flash or network connectivity.
- The ``CFG`` mechanism is implemented directly as C preprocessor values or
- macros, depending on what they are in turn describing. While we have some
- functionality that is very reasonable to expose to the end user to enable or
- disable we have other places where we need to describe things such as register
- locations or values, memory map ranges and so on. When practical, we should be
- getting these values from the device tree. However, there are cases where this
- is either not practical due to when we need the information and may not have a
- device tree yet or due to legacy reasons code has not been rewritten.
- When to use each mechanism
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- While there are some cases where it should be fairly obvious where to use each
- mechanism, as for example a command would be done via Kconfig, a new I2C driver
- should use Kconfig and be configured via driver model and a header of values
- generated by an external tool should be ``CFG``, there will be cases where it's
- less clear and one needs to take care when implementing it. In general,
- configuration *options* should be done in Kconfig and configuration *settings*
- should be done in driver model or ``CFG``. Let us discuss things to keep in mind
- when picking the appropriate mechanism.
- A thing to keep in mind is that we have a strong preference for using Kconfig as
- the primary build time configuration mechanism. Options expressed this way let
- us easily express dependencies and abstractions. In addition, given that many
- projects use this mechanism means it has a broad set of tooling and existing
- knowledge base.
- Consider the example of a SHA256 hardware acceleration engine. This would be a
- feature of the SoC and so something to not ask the user if it exists, but we
- would want to have our generic framework for such engines be optionally
- available and depend on knowing we have this engine on a given hardware
- platform. Expressing this should be done as a hidden Kconfig symbol that is
- ``select``'ed by the SoC symbol which would in turn be ``select``'ed by the
- board option, which is user visible. Hardware features that are either present
- or not present should be expressed in Kconfig and in a similar manner, features
- which will always have a constant value such as "this SoC always has 4 cores and
- 4 threads per core" should be as well.
- This brings us to differentiating between a configuration *setting* versus a
- hardware feature. To build on the previous example, while we may know the number
- of cores and threads, it's possible that within a given family of SoCs the base
- addresses of peripherals has changed, but the register offsets within have not.
- The preference in this case is to get our information from the device tree and
- perform run time configuration. However, this is not always practical and in
- those cases we instead rely on the ``CFG`` mechanism. While it would be possible
- to use Kconfig in this case, it would result in using calculated rather than
- constructed values, resulting in less clear code. Consider the example of a set
- of register values for a memory controller. Defining this as a series of logical
- ORs and shifts based on other defines is more clear than the Kconfig entry that
- sets the calculated value alone.
- When it has been determined that the practical solution is to utilize the
- ``CFG`` mechanism, the next decision is where to place these settings. It is
- strongly encouraged to place these in the architecture header files, if they are
- generic to a given SoC, or under the board directory if board specific. Placing
- them under the board.h file in the *include/configs/* directory should be seen
- as a last resort.
|