| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206 |
- .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
- =============
- False Sharing
- =============
- What is False Sharing
- =====================
- False sharing is related with cache mechanism of maintaining the data
- coherence of one cache line stored in multiple CPU's caches; then
- academic definition for it is in [1]_. Consider a struct with a
- refcount and a string::
- struct foo {
- refcount_t refcount;
- ...
- char name[16];
- } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
- Member 'refcount'(A) and 'name'(B) _share_ one cache line like below::
- +-----------+ +-----------+
- | CPU 0 | | CPU 1 |
- +-----------+ +-----------+
- / |
- / |
- V V
- +----------------------+ +----------------------+
- | A B | Cache 0 | A B | Cache 1
- +----------------------+ +----------------------+
- | |
- ---------------------------+------------------+-----------------------------
- | |
- +----------------------+
- | |
- +----------------------+
- Main Memory | A B |
- +----------------------+
- 'refcount' is modified frequently, but 'name' is set once at object
- creation time and is never modified. When many CPUs access 'foo' at
- the same time, with 'refcount' being only bumped by one CPU frequently
- and 'name' being read by other CPUs, all those reading CPUs have to
- reload the whole cache line over and over due to the 'sharing', even
- though 'name' is never changed.
- There are many real-world cases of performance regressions caused by
- false sharing. One of these is a rw_semaphore 'mmap_lock' inside
- mm_struct struct, whose cache line layout change triggered a
- regression and Linus analyzed in [2]_.
- There are two key factors for a harmful false sharing:
- * A global datum accessed (shared) by many CPUs
- * In the concurrent accesses to the data, there is at least one write
- operation: write/write or write/read cases.
- The sharing could be from totally unrelated kernel components, or
- different code paths of the same kernel component.
- False Sharing Pitfalls
- ======================
- Back in time when one platform had only one or a few CPUs, hot data
- members could be purposely put in the same cache line to make them
- cache hot and save cacheline/TLB, like a lock and the data protected
- by it. But for recent large system with hundreds of CPUs, this may
- not work when the lock is heavily contended, as the lock owner CPU
- could write to the data, while other CPUs are busy spinning the lock.
- Looking at past cases, there are several frequently occurring patterns
- for false sharing:
- * lock (spinlock/mutex/semaphore) and data protected by it are
- purposely put in one cache line.
- * global data being put together in one cache line. Some kernel
- subsystems have many global parameters of small size (4 bytes),
- which can easily be grouped together and put into one cache line.
- * data members of a big data structure randomly sitting together
- without being noticed (cache line is usually 64 bytes or more),
- like 'mem_cgroup' struct.
- Following 'mitigation' section provides real-world examples.
- False sharing could easily happen unless they are intentionally
- checked, and it is valuable to run specific tools for performance
- critical workloads to detect false sharing affecting performance case
- and optimize accordingly.
- How to detect and analyze False Sharing
- ========================================
- perf record/report/stat are widely used for performance tuning, and
- once hotspots are detected, tools like 'perf-c2c' and 'pahole' can
- be further used to detect and pinpoint the possible false sharing
- data structures. 'addr2line' is also good at decoding instruction
- pointer when there are multiple layers of inline functions.
- perf-c2c can capture the cache lines with most false sharing hits,
- decoded functions (line number of file) accessing that cache line,
- and in-line offset of the data. Simple commands are::
- $ perf c2c record -ag sleep 3
- $ perf c2c report --call-graph none -k vmlinux
- When running above during testing will-it-scale's tlb_flush1 case,
- perf reports something like::
- Total records : 1658231
- Locked Load/Store Operations : 89439
- Load Operations : 623219
- Load Local HITM : 92117
- Load Remote HITM : 139
- #----------------------------------------------------------------------
- 4 0 2374 0 0 0 0xff1100088366d880
- #----------------------------------------------------------------------
- 0.00% 42.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x8 1 1 0xffffffff81373b7b 0 231 129 5312 64 [k] __mod_lruvec_page_state [kernel.vmlinux] memcontrol.h:752 1
- 0.00% 13.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x8 1 1 0xffffffff81374718 0 226 97 3551 64 [k] folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave [kernel.vmlinux] memcontrol.h:752 1
- 0.00% 11.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x8 1 1 0xffffffff812c29bf 0 170 136 555 64 [k] lru_add_fn [kernel.vmlinux] mm_inline.h:41 1
- 0.00% 7.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x8 1 1 0xffffffff812c3ec5 0 175 108 632 64 [k] release_pages [kernel.vmlinux] mm_inline.h:41 1
- 0.00% 23.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x10 1 1 0xffffffff81372d0a 0 234 279 1051 64 [k] __mod_memcg_lruvec_state [kernel.vmlinux] memcontrol.c:736 1
- A nice introduction for perf-c2c is [3]_.
- 'pahole' decodes data structure layouts delimited in cache line
- granularity. Users can match the offset in perf-c2c output with
- pahole's decoding to locate the exact data members. For global
- data, users can search the data address in System.map.
- Possible Mitigations
- ====================
- False sharing does not always need to be mitigated. False sharing
- mitigations should balance performance gains with complexity and
- space consumption. Sometimes, lower performance is OK, and it's
- unnecessary to hyper-optimize every rarely used data structure or
- a cold data path.
- False sharing hurting performance cases are seen more frequently with
- core count increasing. Because of these detrimental effects, many
- patches have been proposed across variety of subsystems (like
- networking and memory management) and merged. Some common mitigations
- (with examples) are:
- * Separate hot global data in its own dedicated cache line, even if it
- is just a 'short' type. The downside is more consumption of memory,
- cache line and TLB entries.
- - Commit 91b6d3256356 ("net: cache align tcp_memory_allocated, tcp_sockets_allocated")
- * Reorganize the data structure, separate the interfering members to
- different cache lines. One downside is it may introduce new false
- sharing of other members.
- - Commit 802f1d522d5f ("mm: page_counter: re-layout structure to reduce false sharing")
- * Replace 'write' with 'read' when possible, especially in loops.
- Like for some global variable, use compare(read)-then-write instead
- of unconditional write. For example, use::
- if (!test_bit(XXX))
- set_bit(XXX);
- instead of directly "set_bit(XXX);", similarly for atomic_t data::
- if (atomic_read(XXX) == AAA)
- atomic_set(XXX, BBB);
- - Commit 7b1002f7cfe5 ("bcache: fixup bcache_dev_sectors_dirty_add() multithreaded CPU false sharing")
- - Commit 292648ac5cf1 ("mm: gup: allow FOLL_PIN to scale in SMP")
- * Turn hot global data to 'per-cpu data + global data' when possible,
- or reasonably increase the threshold for syncing per-cpu data to
- global data, to reduce or postpone the 'write' to that global data.
- - Commit 520f897a3554 ("ext4: use percpu_counters for extent_status cache hits/misses")
- - Commit 56f3547bfa4d ("mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy")
- Surely, all mitigations should be carefully verified to not cause side
- effects. To avoid introducing false sharing when coding, it's better
- to:
- * Be aware of cache line boundaries
- * Group mostly read-only fields together
- * Group things that are written at the same time together
- * Separate frequently read and frequently written fields on
- different cache lines.
- and better add a comment stating the false sharing consideration.
- One note is, sometimes even after a severe false sharing is detected
- and solved, the performance may still have no obvious improvement as
- the hotspot switches to a new place.
- Miscellaneous
- =============
- One open issue is that kernel has an optional data structure
- randomization mechanism, which also randomizes the situation of cache
- line sharing of data members.
- .. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_sharing
- .. [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whoqV=cX5VC80mmR9rr+Z+yQ6fiQZm36Fb-izsanHg23w@mail.gmail.com/
- .. [3] https://joemario.github.io/blog/2016/09/01/c2c-blog/
|