123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136 |
- From cff138b0747fa39765cbc641b66cfa5d7f1735d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
- From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 16:05:56 +0200
- Subject: [PATCH 09/14] SAE: Use constant time operations in
- sae_test_pwd_seed_ffc()
- Try to avoid showing externally visible timing or memory access
- differences regardless of whether the derived pwd-value is smaller than
- the group prime.
- This is related to CVE-2019-9494.
- Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
- ---
- src/common/sae.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
- 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
- diff --git a/src/common/sae.c b/src/common/sae.c
- index fa9a145..eaf825d 100644
- --- a/src/common/sae.c
- +++ b/src/common/sae.c
- @@ -334,14 +334,17 @@ static int sae_test_pwd_seed_ecc(struct sae_data *sae, const u8 *pwd_seed,
- }
-
-
- +/* Returns -1 on fatal failure, 0 if PWE cannot be derived from the provided
- + * pwd-seed, or 1 if a valid PWE was derived from pwd-seed. */
- static int sae_test_pwd_seed_ffc(struct sae_data *sae, const u8 *pwd_seed,
- struct crypto_bignum *pwe)
- {
- u8 pwd_value[SAE_MAX_PRIME_LEN];
- size_t bits = sae->tmp->prime_len * 8;
- u8 exp[1];
- - struct crypto_bignum *a, *b;
- - int res;
- + struct crypto_bignum *a, *b = NULL;
- + int res, is_val;
- + u8 pwd_value_valid;
-
- wpa_hexdump_key(MSG_DEBUG, "SAE: pwd-seed", pwd_seed, SHA256_MAC_LEN);
-
- @@ -353,16 +356,29 @@ static int sae_test_pwd_seed_ffc(struct sae_data *sae, const u8 *pwd_seed,
- wpa_hexdump_key(MSG_DEBUG, "SAE: pwd-value", pwd_value,
- sae->tmp->prime_len);
-
- - if (os_memcmp(pwd_value, sae->tmp->dh->prime, sae->tmp->prime_len) >= 0)
- - {
- - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "SAE: pwd-value >= p");
- - return 0;
- - }
- + /* Check whether pwd-value < p */
- + res = const_time_memcmp(pwd_value, sae->tmp->dh->prime,
- + sae->tmp->prime_len);
- + /* pwd-value >= p is invalid, so res is < 0 for the valid cases and
- + * the negative sign can be used to fill the mask for constant time
- + * selection */
- + pwd_value_valid = const_time_fill_msb(res);
- +
- + /* If pwd-value >= p, force pwd-value to be < p and perform the
- + * calculations anyway to hide timing difference. The derived PWE will
- + * be ignored in that case. */
- + pwd_value[0] = const_time_select_u8(pwd_value_valid, pwd_value[0], 0);
-
- /* PWE = pwd-value^((p-1)/r) modulo p */
-
- + res = -1;
- a = crypto_bignum_init_set(pwd_value, sae->tmp->prime_len);
- + if (!a)
- + goto fail;
-
- + /* This is an optimization based on the used group that does not depend
- + * on the password in any way, so it is fine to use separate branches
- + * for this step without constant time operations. */
- if (sae->tmp->dh->safe_prime) {
- /*
- * r = (p-1)/2 for the group used here, so this becomes:
- @@ -376,33 +392,34 @@ static int sae_test_pwd_seed_ffc(struct sae_data *sae, const u8 *pwd_seed,
- b = crypto_bignum_init_set(exp, sizeof(exp));
- if (b == NULL ||
- crypto_bignum_sub(sae->tmp->prime, b, b) < 0 ||
- - crypto_bignum_div(b, sae->tmp->order, b) < 0) {
- - crypto_bignum_deinit(b, 0);
- - b = NULL;
- - }
- + crypto_bignum_div(b, sae->tmp->order, b) < 0)
- + goto fail;
- }
-
- - if (a == NULL || b == NULL)
- - res = -1;
- - else
- - res = crypto_bignum_exptmod(a, b, sae->tmp->prime, pwe);
- -
- - crypto_bignum_deinit(a, 0);
- - crypto_bignum_deinit(b, 0);
- + if (!b)
- + goto fail;
-
- - if (res < 0) {
- - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "SAE: Failed to calculate PWE");
- - return -1;
- - }
- + res = crypto_bignum_exptmod(a, b, sae->tmp->prime, pwe);
- + if (res < 0)
- + goto fail;
-
- - /* if (PWE > 1) --> found */
- - if (crypto_bignum_is_zero(pwe) || crypto_bignum_is_one(pwe)) {
- - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "SAE: PWE <= 1");
- - return 0;
- - }
- + /* There were no fatal errors in calculations, so determine the return
- + * value using constant time operations. We get here for number of
- + * invalid cases which are cleared here after having performed all the
- + * computation. PWE is valid if pwd-value was less than prime and
- + * PWE > 1. Start with pwd-value check first and then use constant time
- + * operations to clear res to 0 if PWE is 0 or 1.
- + */
- + res = const_time_select_u8(pwd_value_valid, 1, 0);
- + is_val = crypto_bignum_is_zero(pwe);
- + res = const_time_select_u8(const_time_is_zero(is_val), res, 0);
- + is_val = crypto_bignum_is_one(pwe);
- + res = const_time_select_u8(const_time_is_zero(is_val), res, 0);
-
- - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "SAE: PWE found");
- - return 1;
- +fail:
- + crypto_bignum_deinit(a, 1);
- + crypto_bignum_deinit(b, 1);
- + return res;
- }
-
-
- --
- 2.7.4
|