| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142 |
- C Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce
- (*
- * Result: Sometimes
- *
- * This litmus test shows that a release-acquire chain, while sufficient
- * when there is but one non-reads-from (AKA non-rf) link, does not suffice
- * if there is more than one. Of the three processes, only P1() reads from
- * P0's write, which means that there are two non-rf links: P1() to P2()
- * is a write-to-write link (AKA a "coherence" or just "co" link) and P2()
- * to P0() is a read-to-write link (AKA a "from-reads" or just "fr" link).
- * When there are two or more non-rf links, you typically will need one
- * full barrier for each non-rf link. (Exceptions include some cases
- * involving locking.)
- *)
- {}
- P0(int *x, int *y)
- {
- WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
- smp_store_release(y, 1);
- }
- P1(int *y, int *z)
- {
- int r0;
- r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
- smp_store_release(z, 1);
- }
- P2(int *x, int *z)
- {
- int r1;
- WRITE_ONCE(*z, 2);
- smp_mb();
- r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
- }
- exists (1:r0=1 /\ z=2 /\ 2:r1=0)
|